Been a customer for years, love the pouch, but the rest is shrinking! Waist band now only about an inch from top of pouch band. Seams shred after a few washes.
I have been buying Munsingwear since 1968 and they lasted 15 years or so with little wear showing . As the years went buy my wife would order them for me, but lately she is not happy with the quality,waistband freys after a few washes. That never was a problem for many years but now The quality is questionable to say the least. I prefer the kangaroo pouch, otherwise I would buy another brand. I think your quality control dept. is slipping.
Been wearing these for years. When it was time to re-order, they were not in stock. I guess that was when the manufacturer was being changed. When they became available, I ordered. What arrived was of a thinner material, seemed smaller, and were not as comfortable. Now I want to order again, but I am going to sample other brands as well as order one set from here. I see that there are people commenting they are pleased with this product. Glad for them; I'm not. I'm writing this in the hope that Munsingwear will return to the previous quality, which were made in Canada according to one of the labels I can still read. I would buy those again.
They used to be made in Canada, and I would have rated those as 5 stars. Since they moved the manufacturing overseas, the quality has definitely suffered. However, the boxer briefs are still the most comfortable underwear I've ever owned.
Recommended |
Feels True To Size
Shawn Rosvold |
from Colorado Springs, CO |
December 27, 2015
Wear my Munsingwear Kangaroo Pouch boxer briefs daily. They (the manufacturer) had a production glitch with my previous purchase...returned easily for refund (thanks!)...this time around, the product fits EXACTLY how it should - which is GREAT!
Most support of any brief I have used. In the past,I have had a problem with the elastic stretching. Now I don't dry them in the dryer and this has greatly improved their longevity. I won't buy any other brand or style.
FLY OPENING IS GETTING CLOSER TO THE WAIST BAND
EVER TIME I ORDER.THE MOST COMFORTABLE ONES HAVE
THE FLY OPENING 3 1?2 IN. FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE
WAISTBAND. THE NEXT IS 1 3/4 IN. FROM THE BOTTOM
OF THE WAIST BAND. THE LAST ORDER IS 1/2 IN. FROM
THE WAIST BAND. CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY?
I WILL NOT ORDER ANY MORE FROM YOU IF YOU
CAN'T MAINTAIN A CONSTANT PATTERN.
Not Recommended |
Feels True To Size
DESCOURGED |
from GREAT BEND, KS |
August 14, 2014
PURCHASED XL A FEW YEARS AGO. BUT EVENTUALLY THEY GOT TOO LARGE/STRETCHED.
SO I BOUGHT LARGE THIS TIME AND THEY ARE A BIT TIGHT. NOT WHAT I EXPECTED.
APPEARS TO BE A NEW MANUFACTURER, SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT IN STYLE.
Something has changed (either me or the briefs). I've worn Munsingwear pouch briefs before and liked them, but these are ill-fitting and uncomfortable.
My husband has worn these briefs for 15 years. The latest round is cut an inch shorter. They do not fit at all. I now buy him Jockey with the same opening. I've reviewed these before, with a picture, but decided to again since I keep getting emails to review this product.
Another reviewer mentioned how high the pouch opening was but I find it to be a very good location. Provides "easy access" especially compared to other brands that offer a horizontal opening. My inventory includes briefs, boxer-briefs, and long underwear--all are great.
Recommended |
Feels True To Size
Long-time Munsing-wearer |
from Wisconsin |
April 3, 2014
Have worn/ordered Munsingwear Kangaroo Pouch underwear from here before...GREATLY disappointed in this latest/newest version of what was a SUPERIOR product!!! Such a shame...it will take a lot for me to ever order these again...they've been replaced by Jockey boxer-briefs with a similar "pouch"...
Too small for the stated size! 
mr. davis 
these are underwear! what can I say? 
Uncomfortable 
FLY OPENING IS MOVING UP. 
